I like the idea of revisiting what a @mozilla.org email address means
today, and I think that outstanding longtime leadership is probably best
matching what it is today, and what it could mean if we handed out new ones.
I'd not waive that requirements for paid contributors, though. I'd also
wouldn't restrict it to reps for non-paid contributors.
Technically, I'd ask for a revocation policy to be included. And we'd
probably need at least best-practices on what usernames to use. The
current list is very much nick-names, is that good? Do we need to care?
Axel
On 10/25/13 6:31 AM, Benjamin Kerensa wrote:
Hello Governance,
I'm writing today to put forward the following proposal for @mozilla.org
email addresses for Mozilla Reps as outlined here:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/User:Mrz/mozilla-org
Additionally, I would like to highlight the following policy that the
ReMo Council has put together in regards to email addresses for ReMo:
https://remo.etherpad.mozilla.org/email-policy
These proposals and proposed policies have been the work of both
community contributors and staff and I think adding email addresses as a
tool for contributors would be beneficial and add authenticity to
discussions community contributors often have with third parties
including universities, media and developers they engage with in order
to further the goals of Mozilla.
Many other open source projects already have practices of doing this
(Ubuntu: @ubuntu.com, Debian: @debian.org, GNOME: @gnome.org and so on).
Let's start a discussion on this and see where it goes!
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
