On Friday, October 25, 2013 1:03:09 PM UTC-4, Benjamin Kerensa wrote: > If we just did aliases the cost would be almost nothing. Most mail > providers support treating aliases like a new address.
In our current setup it actually is a bit more involved. We still have some one-off accounts going back to the early days that aren't just aliases, those that are aliases still go through a spam filter that we pay for (per account), and mail that comes in to be relayed to a forwarded destination still traverses infrastructure that has to scale to meet demand unless we were to point MX for all of @mozilla.org to some outsourced entity. Unfortunately, the cost is far from nothing. I'm not trying to shoot this down, I want to make sure that we all are aware that this can quickly become a significant investment, and then how do we scale it to the vision that Mitchell gave us for our contributor base in the years to come? _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
