I wanted to add that I had an opportunity to talk to a few staff from the Portland office who have been following this and they like the idea.
One suggested that all staff and contributors should use @mozilla.org On Oct 29, 2013 7:05 AM, "Gervase Markham" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 25/10/13 18:30, Monica Chew wrote: > > I think it's a wonderful idea to give Reps and other contributors > > email addresses. Can I suggest mozillians.org instead of mozilla.org, > > though? mozilla.org is not sufficiently distinguishable from > > mozilla.com to avoid confusing paid staff from not, and Mozillian has > > the benefit of sounding like a person-descriptor. > > I think making the distinction between paid staff and volunteers more > clear is actively an anti-goal. > > When this program happens, I would like to see paid staff who qualify > for @mozilla.org starting to use that email address as their primary > Mozilla identity. A few of us already do that. > > > I should also point out that in the future, it may become very > > important to be able to distinguish official email from Mozilla as a > > project, versus someone who is affiliated with Mozilla (as paid staff > > or not). > > Email always comes from a person, it never comes from an organization > (at least, I hope Mozilla will never even attempt to be that > impersonal!). I do not think there will be a problem distinguishing > summit announcements from e.g. IETF contributions (which are always > individual), even if both come from @mozilla.org email addresses. > > Gerv > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
