Getting back to emails, because I don't think you need to opt in to this inner circle to be able to speak for mozilla or deserve an email - what would be the abuse of the email that could get it revoked? Does the vouching system still work for emails if there isn't some responsibility attached?
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Leo McArdle <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/11/13 18:54, Majken Connor wrote: > > The outlier is someone who is bringing a friend into Mozilla, they will > > already have personal trust. I think another time limit might be useful > > here. Must have had a Mozillians account for at least x amount of time. > > Sometimes a timeline is artificial, but I think it's ok in this case > > because ideally we are granting emails to people who will continue to use > > them for Mozilla contributions. A timeline will help show if the person > has > > come in to contribute to one project then move on, ie if they are just > > visiting town or if they've decided to move here ;) > > Might that already be covered by the Mafia proposal? While I might trust > my friend with my wallet, for example, does that necessarily mean I > trust them to know what Mozilla is, and trust them to contribute? I'm > not sure. > > I see here a possible case whereby Mozillians have trust in a potential > contributor, but that potential contributor hasn't actually contributed > yet. Do we need to include in the Mafia system some requirement for > evidence of prior contribution, or 'punishment' for a voucher who > vouches for someone who hasn't contributed yet? (Or does the timeline > solve this problem?) > > ~Leo > > > _______________________________________________ > governance mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance > > _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
