On 26/06/15 22:51, B Galliart wrote: > - Why is a private/undocumented API needed and used?
At a quick glance, it seems pretty well documented: http://getpocket.com/developer/docs/overview > - Why is the only server currently compatible with the Firefox integration of > Pocket available only for non-commercial use? > > - Do they plan to take any legal action against compatible servers which > clone the protocol? > > If tomorrow (or any other day in the near future) Pocket started clarifying > the issues and it turned out all of these secrets where just oversight in > them being transparent/open then I will be a lot happier. But I don't think > we are even to the point of an ETA on reaching that. So far Pocket has not > been very open. Have you attempted to contact them? Cheers, David -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
