On 1/5/17 12:15 AM, Emma Humphries wrote: > The motivation is that while we have a mechanism (comment tagging) for > marking abusive, spam, and off-topic comments, which, in some cases, will > result in suspending an account automatically, I wanted to be more > deliberate about responding to these.
Is there documentation about which of these might/will lead to accound termination? I use off-topic/offtopic freely to clear unproductive clutter out of bugs (including sometimes my own comments) but I don't intend any negative karma toward the commenter. If they persist then "abusive" and "spam" are more appropriate and I do believe both of those add negativity. If "off-topic" is a harmful tag can we have a more neutral one such as "clutter" which will auto-hide the comment without any negative associations with the poster? I'm thinking especially of times when people paste testcases or log output directly in comments that make the bug hard to read but aren't wrong, per se. I guess I can use "obsolete" but that's not quite right most of the time. [For those who haven't seen it, the magic tags are documented at https://wiki.mozilla.org/BMO/comment_tagging ] -Dan Veditz _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
