Phillip
Do you mean adding an attribute to patient dimension records?  How would the 
researcher employ that information without asking for some custom SQL?
Jim
________________________________________
From: Phillip Reeder [phillip.ree...@utsouthwestern.edu]
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:36 PM
To: Dan Connolly; gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu; Campbell, James R
Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #103: subject of observation (e.g. maternal 
findings relevant to child)

In general, I would link to the mother¹s medical record with a ³Child of²
attribute.  Currently, i2b2 doesn¹t allow that linking to be done through
the query tool, but it could be queried through the backend database.

Phillip



On 4/7/14, 1:20 PM, "Dan Connolly" <dconno...@kumc.edu> wrote:

>On second thought... I see where the requirements come from.
>
> Jim points out that we can precoordinate that into the domain ontology
>or we can consider
> whether we want to capture the semantics in the i2b2 model
>
>Anybody have a preference on how to represent stuff like
> - maternal gestational diabetes
> - maternal BMI
>?
>
>________________________________________
>From: GPC Informatics [d...@madmode.com]
>Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:15 PM
>To: campb...@unmc.edu; Dan Connolly
>Cc: Russ Waitman
>Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #103: subject of observation (e.g.
>maternal findings relevant to child)
>
>#103: subject of observation (e.g. maternal findings relevant to child)
>--------------------------+----------------------------
> Reporter:  campbell      |       Owner:  campbell
>     Type:  design-issue  |      Status:  reopened
> Priority:  major         |   Milestone:  data-domains2
>Component:  data-stds     |  Resolution:
> Keywords:                |  Blocked By:
> Blocking:  33            |
>--------------------------+----------------------------
>Changes (by dconnolly):
>
> * status:  closed => reopened
> * resolution:  wontfix =>
> * blocking:   => 33
>
>
>Comment:
>
> Looks like I was premature in closing this. I see discussion of maternal
> factors in **EHR Details 02-15-14.docx** attached to #33
>
> Jim points out:
>
> > We can precoordinate that into the domain ontology or we can consider
> whether we want to capture the semantics in the i2b2 model
>
>--
>Ticket URL:
><http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/103#comment:3>
>gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/>
>Greater Plains Network - Informatics
>_______________________________________________
>Gpc-dev mailing list
>Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu
>http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev


________________________________

UT Southwestern Medical Center
The future of medicine, today.




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message was secured by ZixCorp(R).

The information in this e-mail may be privileged and confidential, intended 
only for the use of the addressee(s) above. Any unauthorized use or disclosure 
of this information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, 
please delete it and immediately contact the sender.

_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to