#155: Define Encounter type terms and Epic ETL
--------------------------+---------------------------------
 Reporter:  lv            |       Owner:  campbell
     Type:  design-issue  |      Status:  reopened
 Priority:  major         |   Milestone:  data-stds-gov-plan
Component:  data-stds     |  Resolution:
 Keywords:                |  Blocked By:
 Blocking:  160           |
--------------------------+---------------------------------
Changes (by dconnolly):

 * status:  closed => reopened
 * resolution:  invalid =>
 * blocking:   => 160


Old description:

> Create a GPC definition for "Encounter"; may be based upon input from
> DSSNI or unique to the network.
>
> Discussed on the dev call 9/16/14.

New description:

 Create a GPC definition for "Encounter"; may be based upon input from
 DSSNI or unique to the network.

  - SQL queries to classify Epic CLARITY encounters according to type
    - ''Cattails, Cerner design should follow straightforwardly''
  - term hierarchy (names, paths) for
    - aggregated counts on babel
    - federated queries

 initially discussed on the dev call 9/16/14.

--

Comment:

 Looks like next step could be to get details on this:

   Epic has provided an unfortunate excess of encounters such that
 administrative, billing and non-patient care events are all assigned as
 encounters.  Segregating between ED and hospitalizations as well as
 ambulatory surgery is a bit convoluted but we have sorted out the Clarity
 data structures necessary to do so.

   - [http://listserv.kumc.edu/pipermail/gpc-dev/2014q3/000373.html
 Campbell 15 Aug]

--
Ticket URL: 
<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/155#comment:3>
gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/>
Greater Plains Network - Informatics
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to