AT UTHSCSA our labs currently shown in babel are not correctly mapped from EPIC component IDs. Rather than curate the lab data into categories, we're working on a UMLS meta-thesaurus LOINC implementation, which should be deployed soon.
---- Angela Bos Clinical Informatics Research Division Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics UT Health Science Center at San Antonio Phone: (210) 562-4074 From: gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu [mailto:gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu] On Behalf Of Belay Demeke Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 1:53 PM To: 'gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu' Subject: GPC Lab Tree Construction Methodology Hello All, Looking at the i2b2 Laboratory Test hierarchy construction, it appeared that many sites use different methodologies. For instance, KUMC is built based on EMR, UMNC based on Regenstrief Institute's LOINC tree, UMN based on UMLS, and MCRF based on Harvard(LLB22/i2b2/SHRINE). Our goal is to find out which tree construction methodology is used for the following sites - MCW, CMH, UIowa, UTSW, UTHSCA and WISC. Can you please send us your feedback what methodology used at your site? Thank you, Belay Demeke
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
