Reminder: materials for the Tuesday teleconference agenda are due at T-24hrs, 
i.e. 11am Monday.

Recall from last 
week<http://listserv.kumc.edu/pipermail/gpc-dev/2015q1/001450.html>:

     *   ...

<http://listserv.kumc.edu/pipermail/gpc-dev/2015q1/001424.html>

     *   Q1 2015 Quality 
Query<http://listserv.kumc.edu/pipermail/gpc-dev/2015q1/001424.html>

        *   ...

        *   Tom: OK; please everybody share such diffs/experience; perhaps it 
merits changes to GPC ontologies.

        *   Dan: mid-April milestone due date sound OK? So sites need to do 
their part in the next week so we can review and write up the results on time. 
Tom: I expect ~1day work at each site, so don’t delay!

           *   Jim M: can’t be sure UNMC has bandwidth for that timeline; HH on 
holiday this week.

I see an experience report from 
UTHSCSA<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/238#comment:11> 
and a few questions from other sites. So we're at 1 for 10, Tom? Or did I miss 
some? Or did they report experience privately?

If anyone has experience they haven't shared with the group, NOW is the time.

Anything from "we have our results complete and we went to upload them but 
failed to log in to REDCap" to "we tried to run the query but all we got was a 
pile of syntax errors" is welcome (though only one site, UNMC, said they didn't 
have bandwidth to spend up to one day working through syntax errors). But 
please don't wait 'till the teleconference to share your status.

--
Dan


________________________________
From: Munns, Michael B [mike.mu...@unmc.edu]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 9:53 AM
To: Tom Mish; gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu; Dan Connolly
Cc: Bhargav Adagarla; John Steinmetz
Subject: RE: [gpc-informatics] #232: Q1 2015 QA exercise

In the create script for the obesity active patients 
(Q1_2015_GPC_OBESITY_ACTIVE_PATIENTS) the where condition for the BMI part it 
has ” concept_path = '\GPC\Vital Signs\LOINC:39156-5\' “

We do not have the GPC metadata installed. We do have BMI under PCORI that does 
have facts.

Can that be used instead?

Should we download and install GPC metadata?

Michael Munns
Database Analyst
402-559-3821

From: gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu 
[mailto:gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Mish
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 8:15 AM
To: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu; dconno...@kumc.edu
Cc: badaga...@kumc.edu; jsteinm...@kumc.edu
Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #232: Q1 2015 QA exercise

A new version of the query was updated.

  *   Jim moved the comments/version history section to a separate document
  *   The changes in this are to the output (variable names and ordering)  
produced to make it easier to import into redcap.

-TM

The information in this e-mail may be privileged and confidential, intended 
only for the use of the addressee(s) above. Any unauthorized use or disclosure 
of this information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, 
please delete it and immediately contact the sender.
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev

Reply via email to