Bingo. Another way to look at it: development of SCILHS i2p-transform was informed by gpc-pcorenet-cdm and now we're converging.
-- Dan ________________________________ From: gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu [gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu] on behalf of French, Tony [adfre...@regenstrief.org] Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 12:37 PM To: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu Subject: Re: gpc_terms --> pcornet_terms mapping Just trying to follow the various threads… what are the differences between gpc-pcorenet-cdm and i2p-transform projects? Am I wrong in thinking that they are just two different approaches to converting the GPC i2b2 structure to the PCORNet CDM? Was the gpc-pcorenet-cdm approach taken by the majority of the sites for CDM v1 and v2 and then the SCHILS i2p-transform approach is being adopted as the primary approach for CDMv3? As a Phase 2 site, we started directly with the SCHILS transform approach with CDM v3 and I just want to verify that we are not missing something from gpc-pcorenet-cdm. -Tony
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
