Thanks. Good news: we have governance for real dates. Bad news: the protocol calls for real dates, but that's operationally challenging in GPC. Perhaps it's not that bad: we did it before in #448<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/448>.
excerpt from section 11.0 Data and Specimen Management: 1. ... To minimize the risk of loss of confidentiality, we will only use de-identified data with actual encounter dates (i.e., no date shift) and indeed our analyses do not require any protected health information. -- Dan ________________________________ From: Charon Gladfelter [charon.gladfel...@northwestern.edu] Sent: Monday, December 05, 2016 4:21 PM To: Kho, Abel; Dan Connolly; Al'ona Furmanchuk Cc: <gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu>; Bernard Black Subject: RE: NEXT-D: de-identified encounter dates? Dan – Please see the our IRB approved protocol attached. Best, Charon
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
