San Antonio submitted at 2:30pm yesterday(7/31) we are still waiting to hear
back from PCORI. They were probably overwhelmed by all of the people submitting
on the due date.
________________________________________
From: Gpc-dev [gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu] on behalf of
gpc-dev-requ...@listserv.kumc.edu [gpc-dev-requ...@listserv.kumc.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 11:13 AM
To: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu
Subject: Gpc-dev Digest, Vol 42, Issue 2
Send Gpc-dev mailing list submissions to
gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
gpc-dev-requ...@listserv.kumc.edu
You can reach the person managing the list at
gpc-dev-ow...@listserv.kumc.edu
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gpc-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. gpc-dev 1 Aug: cancel in 3... 2... 1... (Dan Connolly)
2. Re: [gpc-informatics] #579: Data Characterization - Cycle 3
Tracking (GPC Informatics)
3. RE: gpc-dev 1 Aug: cancel in 3... 2... 1... (Russ Waitman)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 15:11:59 +0000
From: Dan Connolly <dconno...@kumc.edu>
To: "," <gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu>
Subject: gpc-dev 1 Aug: cancel in 3... 2... 1...
Message-ID:
<9c5d412dbfa98843b95f1d9f297bbfab75eab...@exmail3.kumc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I haven't managed to get an agenda together. Is there anything sufficiently
important to discuss today that I shouldn't cancel?
--
Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://listserv.kumc.edu/pipermail/gpc-dev/attachments/20170801/eec255b3/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 16:09:14 +0000
From: "GPC Informatics" <d...@madmode.com>
To: verhagen.lau...@mcrf.mfldclin.edu, mprit...@kumc.edu,
dconno...@kumc.edu, campb...@unmc.edu, kosin...@mcw.edu,
jmcc...@unmc.edu, hangs...@umn.edu, rwait...@kumc.edu
Cc: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu
Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #579: Data Characterization - Cycle 3
Tracking
Message-ID:
<0100015d9e8ef03d-b96038aa-08f8-4822-acc9-26364da54e54-000...@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
#579: Data Characterization - Cycle 3 Tracking
------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: lv | Owner: mprittie
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: cdm-cycle3
Component: data-stds | Resolution:
Keywords: CDM v3, DCQ, EDC | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by rwaitman):
Iowa and Indiana approved on 8/1.
UTSW had a very simple issue of not specifying 3.1 in the Harvest Table.
Phillip was rerunning on the 31st and plans to submit today. Russ
suggested he let DRN OC know.
Todd says Mizzou submitted at 7pm on 7/31 and shared info with Cerner/CMH
colleagues on a replication issue to make the submission go through. That
hopefully meant CMH could also submit yesterday. Gary Gasperino at Cerner
typically does it for CMH.
Also need to know status from San Antonio.
--
Ticket URL:
<http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/579#comment:15>
gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/>
Greater Plains Network - Informatics
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 16:13:17 +0000
From: Russ Waitman <rwait...@kumc.edu>
To: Dan Connolly <dconno...@kumc.edu>
Cc: "PCORnet DRN OC \(dr...@pcornet.org\)" <dr...@pcornet.org>,
"GPC-DEV@LISTSERV.KUMC.EDU" <GPC-DEV@LISTSERV.KUMC.EDU>, "Mark Hoffman
PhD \(mhoff...@cmh.edu\) \(mhoff...@cmh.edu\)" <mhoff...@cmh.edu>
Subject: RE: gpc-dev 1 Aug: cancel in 3... 2... 1...
Message-ID:
<305c38892400524eb4734a98db6c74ac24530...@exmail4.kumc.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Had a brief chat with Todd, Brian and Jim. Looks like we're in better shape on
the CDM refresh this cycle. See my notes o
http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/579#comment:15
Mizzou went in late last night. UTSW had that small bug of 3.0 instead of 3.1
mentioned in the harvest table and Phillip is fixing now to submit today.
Will just need to confirm status with CMH and San Antonio.
- CMH Cerner team should have received the replication issue info in
time to submit last night.
- I think the regulatory hurdles in San Antonio were overcome but not
sure on the timing for the actual CDM work.
Russ
From: Gpc-dev [mailto:gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu] On Behalf Of Dan
Connolly
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2017 10:12 AM
To: ,
Subject: gpc-dev 1 Aug: cancel in 3... 2... 1...
I haven't managed to get an agenda together. Is there anything sufficiently
important to discuss today that I shouldn't cancel?
--
Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://listserv.kumc.edu/pipermail/gpc-dev/attachments/20170801/809e8b2a/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
------------------------------
End of Gpc-dev Digest, Vol 42, Issue 2
**************************************
_______________________________________________
Gpc-dev mailing list
Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu
http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
