Grant reviewers: Somewhere in the range of 2-4 sentences describing the basis for the numerical score is adequate.
Hope that helps. Thanks. Steve -----Original Message----- From: GPC Informatics [mailto:d...@madmode.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 12:19 PM To: Steve Fennel; Dan Connolly Cc: melody.b...@utsouthwestern.edu; adfre...@regenstrief.org; campb...@unmc.edu; Michael Prittie; manue...@uthscsa.edu; gkowal...@mcw.edu; jay.peder...@unmc.edu; bo...@uthscsa.edu; bradley-mcdow...@uiowa.edu; verhagen.lau...@marshfieldresearch.org; m...@wisc.edu; kwa...@uwhealth.org; mo...@health.missouri.edu; meye0...@umn.edu; phillip.ree...@utsouthwestern.edu Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #621: review GPC Pilot applications #621: review GPC Pilot applications --------------------------+------------------------------ Reporter: sfennel | Owner: sfennel Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: grouse-resdac-2 Component: data-sharing | Resolution: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------+------------------------------ Comment (by dconnolly): Steve, Jim Campbell and Tom Mish would like to know how much narrative is expected in the reviews. They find providing the numeric scores straightforward. -- Ticket URL: <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/621#comment:2> gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> Greater Plains Network - Informatics _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
