I would guess that the i2b2 server does not need to initate requests to the SHRINE server. To confirm this, try setting up an iptables rule on the SHRINE server to block the incoming TCP traffic on port 6443. If things are working, then the SHRINE server is only considered the client (sends requests and receives responses) and the i2b2 server is considered the server (accepts requests and sends responses). That should confirm you only need one way traffic.
--- Keith M. Wanta Data Management Developer Enterprise Analytics UW Health 608-492-1099 From: Gpc-dev [mailto:gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu] On Behalf Of French, Tony Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2017 8:36 AM To: Dan Connolly <dconno...@kumc.edu> Cc: GPC-DEV@LISTSERV.KUMC.EDU Subject: Re: GPC SNOW SHRINE status at LEC - 2 Weeks: gold: UTSW, KUMC; silver: MCRF; bronze: WISC, UNMC WARNING: This email appears to have originated outside of the UW Health email system. DO NOT CLICK on links or attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am actively working (over weekend, yesterday and today) on the Indiana node and hope to have the issues resolved ASAP. I just sent a question to the SHRINE listserve but perhaps someone here knows the answer: When running i2b2 and SHRINE on separate application servers, does the I2B2 server need to be able to communicate back to the SHRINE server? Or does SHRINE originate all of the connections to the I2B2 app server. Thanks, Tony Tony French | Interim Assistant Director of Technical Services Center for Biomedical Informatics [cid:image001.png@01D33C30.52E40B90] 1101 West Tenth Street Indianapolis, IN, 46202 Tel 317-274-9087 | Fax: 317-274-9305 Twitter: @Regenstrief | Facebook.com/regenstriefinstitute<http://facebook.com/regenstriefinstitute> www.regenstrief.org<http://www.regenstrief.org/> Confidentiality Notice: The contents of this message and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and/or privileged information and are intended solely for the use of the named addressee(s). Additionally, the information contained herein may have been disclosed to you from medical records with confidentiality protected by federal and state laws. Federal regulations and State laws prohibit you from making further disclosure of such information without the specific written consent of the person to whom the information pertains or as otherwise permitted by such regulations. A general authorization for the release of medical or other information is not sufficient for this purpose. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete the original message. Any retention, disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Gpc-dev <gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu<mailto:gpc-dev-boun...@listserv.kumc.edu>> on behalf of Dan Connolly <dconno...@kumc.edu<mailto:dconno...@kumc.edu>> Date: Monday, October 2, 2017 at 11:39 AM To: "GPC-DEV@LISTSERV.KUMC.EDU<mailto:GPC-DEV@LISTSERV.KUMC.EDU>" <GPC-DEV@LISTSERV.KUMC.EDU<mailto:GPC-DEV@LISTSERV.KUMC.EDU>> Subject: GPC SNOW SHRINE status at LEC - 2 Weeks: gold: UTSW, KUMC; silver: MCRF; bronze: WISC, UNMC I just ran my weekly demographics + diagnosis site-check query, and the results are pretty much the same as last week: * plausible patient count: UTSW, KUMC * counts, but not plausible: MCRF (needs data refresh - #531<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/531>) * could not map query terms: WISC, UNMC (#532<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/532>) * unanticipated problem / unexpected error: MCW, IU (#575<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/575>), UMN (#461<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/461>) * no results (no connectivitiy?): UIOWA (#588<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/588>), CMH (#586<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/586>), UTHSCSA, MU (#600<https://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/600>) WISC and UTHSCSA, if you want a ticket about this, we can get you one. :) I see acknowledgement/updates from UTHSCSA, UIOWA, and CMH (among others) in notes from a 27 Sep GPC site PM meeting. -- Dan
_______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
