It wasn't the user templates I was referring to.
And yes I did a trial conversion of Md2 to both Md3 and BP, I suppose in the
end opting for familiarity and features I was used to and wanted to retain.

My productivity has risen too so I agree we shouldn't use MD2 as a standard.

I am thinking more and more that it is individual GPs who are productive
whatever software they are using and that others will just keep expecting a
package to deliver something to them that they do not have to expend any
effort really learning to use to the max.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Gary Spurge
Sent: Thursday, 22 December 2005 9:00 AM
To: General Practice Computing Group Talk
Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] (no subject)

Dr John Van Dyck wrote:

>Good points.  Once again different people have different needs.   I don't
>want to put drawings into progress notes, but I sure do need a full set of
>templates etc etc  which simply were in the "promised" category at the time
>I checked it out.           I look forward to reconsidering when I check
>again and there is all I need.    Productivity is the name of the game as
>far as I am concerned.
>
>  
>
John

Always good to hear that people have an open mind :)

    * All the MD2 templates came across to BP when I converted to BP. I
      am wondering if you didnt bother with a trial conversion of MD2 to
      BP when you were in your decision making process?
    * At this point, I dont think you can convert data fom MD3 to BP (or
      anyting else). Maybe when other vendors can get copies of MD3 this
      can be clarified.
    * My productivity has risen dramatically since changing from MD2. It
      looks like we have all agreed that MD2 users can be more
      productive by moving to a better package. That is why MD2 is not a
      useful standard to measure other packages by.

Gary
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to