I had to upgrade to 5.1.8.0 or 5.1.8.1 to get it to build on that kernel, I 
think.  Then it worked.

From: gpfsug-discuss <gpfsug-discuss-boun...@gpfsug.org> on behalf of Uwe Falke 
<uwe.fa...@kit.edu>
Date: Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 9:58 AM
To: gpfsug-discuss@gpfsug.org <gpfsug-discuss@gpfsug.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [gpfsug-discuss] GPL compilation failure

Hi, just to let you know:

building the 5.1.7.1 GPL layer for Linux Kernel 4.18.0-477.21.1.el8_8.x86_64 
failed for me:

[...]

In file included from /usr/lpp/mmfs/src/gpl-linux/cfiles.c:87,

                 from /usr/lpp/mmfs/src/gpl-linux/cfiles_cust.c:54:

/usr/lpp/mmfs/src/gpl-linux/cxiCache.c: In function 'pcache_nfs_have_rdirplus':

/usr/lpp/mmfs/src/gpl-linux/cxiCache.c:4011:31: error: 'NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS' 
undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'NFS_INO_ODIRECT'?

                   && test_bit(NFS_INO_ADVISE_RDPLUS, &NFS_I(inodeP)->flags)

                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

                               NFS_INO_ODIRECT

/usr/lpp/mmfs/src/gpl-linux/cxiCache.c:4011:31: note: each undeclared 
identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in

[...]

If anyone managed to build that, a message would be nice, else you should 
expect problems.

I opened a case with IBM but it is caught in the call entry ... (SF 
TS013920636, in case any supporter wants to look after it).

Uwe

--

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)

Steinbuch Centre for Computing (SCC)

Scientific Data Management (SDM)



Uwe Falke



Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, Building 442, Room 187

D-76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen



Tel: +49 721 608 28024

Email: uwe.fa...@kit.edu<mailto:uwe.fa...@kit.edu>

www.scc.kit.edu<http://www.scc.kit.edu/>



Registered office:

Kaiserstraße 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany



KIT – The Research University in the Helmholtz Association
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at gpfsug.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss_gpfsug.org

Reply via email to