upgrading to 4.2.2 fixed the dependency issue. I now get Unable to access CES shared root.
# /usr/lpp/mmfs/bin/mmlsconfig | grep 'cesSharedRoot' cesSharedRoot /vol/system On 3/16/16 2:51 PM, Simon Thompson (Research Computing - IT Services) wrote: > Have you got a half updated system maybe? > > You cant have: > libcap-ng-0.7.3-5.el7.i686 != libcap-ng-0.7.5-4.el7.x86_64 > > I.e. 0.7.3-5 and 0.7.5-4 > > I cant check right now, but are ibm shipping libcap-Ng as part of their > package? > > Simon > ________________________________________ > From: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org > [gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org] on behalf of Matt Weil > [mw...@genome.wustl.edu] > Sent: 16 March 2016 19:37 > To: gpfsug main discussion list > Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 4.2 installer > > any help here? > ~]# yum -d0 -e0 -y install spectrum-scale-object-4.2.0-0 > Error: Multilib version problems found. This often means that the root > cause is something else and multilib version checking is just > pointing out that there is a problem. Eg.: > > 1. You have an upgrade for libcap-ng which is missing some > dependency that another package requires. Yum is trying to > solve this by installing an older version of libcap-ng of the > different architecture. If you exclude the bad architecture > yum will tell you what the root cause is (which package > requires what). You can try redoing the upgrade with > --exclude libcap-ng.otherarch ... this should give you an error > message showing the root cause of the problem. > > 2. You have multiple architectures of libcap-ng installed, but > yum can only see an upgrade for one of those architectures. > If you don't want/need both architectures anymore then you > can remove the one with the missing update and everything > will work. > > 3. You have duplicate versions of libcap-ng installed already. > You can use "yum check" to get yum show these errors. > > ...you can also use --setopt=protected_multilib=false to remove > this checking, however this is almost never the correct thing to > do as something else is very likely to go wrong (often causing > much more problems). > > Protected multilib versions: libcap-ng-0.7.3-5.el7.i686 != > libcap-ng-0.7.5-4.el7.x86_64 > > > On 3/16/16 12:40 PM, Oesterlin, Robert wrote: > My first suggestion is: Don’t deploy the CES nodes manually – way to many > package dependencies. Get those setup right and the installer does a good job. > > If you go through and define your cluster nodes to the installer, you can do > a GPFS upgrade that way. I’ve run into some issues, especially with clone OS > versions of RedHat. (ie, CentOS) It doesn’t give you a whole lot of control > over what it does – give it a ty and it may work well for you. But run it in > a test cluster first or on a limited set of nodes. > > Bob Oesterlin > Sr Storage Engineer, Nuance HPC Grid > 507-269-0413 > > > From: > <<mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org>gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org>> > on behalf of Matt Weil > <mw...@genome.wustl.edu<mailto:mw...@genome.wustl.edu>> > Reply-To: gpfsug main discussion list > <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>> > Date: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 12:36 PM > To: > "<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>" > <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org<mailto:gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>> > Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 4.2 installer > > We have multiple clusters with thousands of nsd's surely there is an > upgrade path. Are you all saying just continue to manually update nsd > servers and manage them as we did previously. Is the installer not > needed if there are current setups. Just deploy CES manually? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > gpfsug-discuss mailing list > gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org > http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss > > > > ____ This email message is a private communication. The information > transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the person or entity > to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, privileged, and/or > proprietary material. Any review, duplication, retransmission, distribution, > or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information > by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is unauthorized by > the sender and is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, > please contact the sender immediately by return email and delete the original > message from all computer systems. Thank you. > _______________________________________________ > gpfsug-discuss mailing list > gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org > http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss ____ This email message is a private communication. The information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, privileged, and/or proprietary material. Any review, duplication, retransmission, distribution, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is unauthorized by the sender and is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately by return email and delete the original message from all computer systems. Thank you. _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
