I was under the impression that AFM could not move between filesystems in the 
same cluster without going through NFS, but perhaps that is outdated. We’ve 
only used it in the past to move data between clusters. Could someone with more 
experience with AFM within a cluster comment? Our goal is to keep the same 
namespace/path for the users (and ideally keep the same filesystem name) by 
switching all clients to point to new cluster after a subset of (active) data 
had been migrated.

Best,
Chris

From: <gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org> on behalf of Marc A Kaplan 
<makap...@us.ibm.com>
Reply-To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Date: Friday, March 29, 2019 at 3:05 PM
To: gpfsug main discussion list <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org>
Subject: Re: [gpfsug-discuss] A net new cluster

I don't know the particulars of the case in question, nor much about ESS 
rules...
But for a vanilla Spectrum Scale cluster -.

1) There is nothing wrong or ill-advised about upgrading software and then 
creating a new version 5.x file system... keeping any older file systems in 
place.

2) I thought AFM was improved years ago to support GPFS native access -- need 
not go through NFS stack...?

Whereas your wrote:

 ... nor is it advisable to try to create a new pool or filesystem in same 
cluster and then migrate (partially because migrating between filesystems 
within a cluster with afm would require going through nfs stack afaik) ...






________________________________
This message is for the recipient’s use only, and may contain confidential, 
privileged or protected information. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of 
this communication is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please 
immediately notify the sender and destroy all copies of this message. The 
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses, as we accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus 
transmitted by this email.
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss

Reply via email to