We've done it both ways. You will get better performance and fewer challenges
of ensuring processes and memory don't step on eachother if afm gateway node is
not also doing nsd server work. However, using an nsd server that mounts two
filesystems (one via mmremotefs from another cluster) did work.
Best,
Chris
On 5/31/19, 2:56 PM, "gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org on behalf of
Weil, Matthew" <gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org on behalf of
mw...@wustl.edu> wrote:
Hello all,
How important is it to separate these two roles. planning on using AFM
and I am wondering if we should have the gateways on different nodes
than the NSDs. Any opinions? What about fail overs and maintenance?
Could one role effect the other?
Thanks
Matt
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gpfsug.org_mailman_listinfo_gpfsug-2Ddiscuss&d=DwIGaQ&c=C9X8xNkG_lwP_-eFHTGejw&r=DopWM-bvfskhBn2zeglfyyw5U2pumni6m_QzQFYFepU&m=ZRGpE3XENwtAlhLHRmvswDiYLgHX5WHNzqGhdZmqMCw&s=23djes6DK8Uzh7SLRQwUA-KphzsnVONiU4ieADwQwMA&e=
________________________________
This message is for the recipient’s use only, and may contain confidential,
privileged or protected information. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of
this communication is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please
immediately notify the sender and destroy all copies of this message. The
recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of
viruses, as we accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this email.
_______________________________________________
gpfsug-discuss mailing list
gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org
http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
