Forwarding for Christof. Please see below. Regards, The Spectrum Scale (GPFS) team
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ If you feel that your question can benefit other users of Spectrum Scale (GPFS), then please post it to the public IBM developerWroks Forum at https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/forum?id=11111111-0000-0000-0000-000000000479. If your query concerns a potential software error in Spectrum Scale (GPFS) and you have an IBM software maintenance contract please contact 1-800-237-5511 in the United States or your local IBM Service Center in other countries. The forum is informally monitored as time permits and should not be used for priority messages to the Spectrum Scale (GPFS) team. ----- Forwarded by Doug Ledden/Austin/IBM on 08/26/2021 01:13 PM ----- From: Christof Schmitt/Tucson/IBM@IBM To: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org Cc: gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org Date: 08/25/2021 05:22 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [gpfsug-discuss] 'force user' samba parameter not implemented Sent by: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org Hi Paul, > We are moving from our v4 SCALE install to a 5.0.5 SCALE install. > We make extensive use of the ‘force user’ parameter in our cross > protocol shares. > I have just been informed, that although we can set the parameter > using ‘net conf’ it isn’t implemented in the current version of > Samba in v5.0.5 of SCALE. This config option is not tested and not supported as part of Spectrum Scale. Only SMB/Samba config parameters that are accessible through the GUI or mmsmb CLI are officially supported. If you have a usecase requiring support for additional Samba parameters, the proper way to request support is through a RFE. That said, i do not see why the Samba behavior would change here from v4 to v5. If you want to debug this, i would suggest to recreate the problem with this parameter in place while capturing a SMB trace (mmprotocoltrace start smb). The SMB trace should then have sufficient information to determine why the owner of the file is not as expected. Regards, Christof Schmitt Software Engineer IBM Systems, Spectrum Scale Development +1 520 799 2469 christof.schm...@us.ibm.com @chsc Twitter IBM ----- Original message ----- From: "Paul Ward" <p.w...@nhm.ac.uk> Sent by: gpfsug-discuss-boun...@spectrumscale.org To: "gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org" <gpfsug-discuss@spectrumscale.org> Cc: Subject: [EXTERNAL] [gpfsug-discuss] 'force user' samba parameter not implemented Date: Tue, Aug 24, 2021 3:04 AM Hi, We are moving from our v4 SCALE install to a 5.0.5 SCALE install. We make extensive use of the ‘force user’ parameter in our cross protocol shares. I have just been informed, that although we can set the parameter using ‘net conf’ it isn’t implemented in the current version of Samba in v5.0.5 of SCALE. Has anyone else faced this issue, and what has been your workaround. Kindest regards, Paul Paul Ward TS Infrastructure Architect Natural History Museum T: 02079426450 E: p.w...@nhm.ac.uk A picture containing drawingDescription automatically generated _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss _______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss
_______________________________________________ gpfsug-discuss mailing list gpfsug-discuss at spectrumscale.org http://gpfsug.org/mailman/listinfo/gpfsug-discuss