Oh, and I forgot one important dependency: python-gpod: LGPL, version 2 or later
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 09:44 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 9/4/07, Thomas Perl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All other things are implemented either by me or as a patch to the > > "GPLv2 or later" gPodder source, which makes all patches and > > contributions "GPLv2 or later", so this can be upgraded to GPLv3, or did > > I miss something here? > > The specific situation that I have been made aware of is when a > codebase is licensed under GPLv2 without the optional "or later > version" clause. This issue has actually prompted a change in how we > communicate licensing summaries inside Fedora packaging, to try to > help package maintainers stay ahead of any potential violations due to > GPLv2 and GPLv3 conflicts. We're also trying to make sure we touc > hbase with upstream developers has licensing changes are announced > just to make sure this potential situation was considered fully. If > all the GPLv2 code you are making use of at build time has the "or > later" clause then things should be okay. > > -jef > _______________________________________________ > gpodder-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/gpodder-devel > > _______________________________________________ gpodder-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/gpodder-devel
