Don't think I'm cranky about this, I knew from the v-number what was up, work in progress and all that. I do appreciate your work and your time, if I had some time to spare I would not be ashamed to pitch in, maybe in the future I can be some help and not just a needy guy.
All joking aside, thanks for the product and the help with it, its running fine now and, well , thats all i need On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 14:48 +0100, Thomas Perl wrote: > Hello, Lofton! > > Lofton H Alley wrote: > > Ok, so I lose all my feeds and start again, so it goes. > > Thanks for walking me through, even though it didn't work out in the > > fluffy bunny way I had hoped, > > Yes, I know it's not a very user-friendly way of upgrading, but that's > why the major version number in the gPodder versions (including the most > recent one) still is "zero". > > I still hope that the features and improvements of the new version make > up for the slightly irritating upgrade path. > > One thing I learned from the whole story is that we should keep > backwards compatible code around for more than just one new version, > because it could happen that people jump some versions instead of > upgrading gradually. Tim Michelsen already pointed that out in an > earlier mail :) > > I still hope you enjoy gPodder. The next upgrades should be more smooth. > > > Thanks, > Thomas > _______________________________________________ > gpodder-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/gpodder-devel _______________________________________________ gpodder-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/gpodder-devel
