Yo All!

u-blox has generously provide me with some EVKs of some newer u-blox
receivers.  That has directly led to updates to ubxtool, ubxtool-examples,
and drivers/driver_ubx.c.  Much more to come.

Out of curiosity I ran some new antenna tests using the UBX-MON-SPAN
command.  These tests run on an F9T receiver in L1/L5 only mode.   So
the results do not apply to L1/L2 mode or L1/L2/L5 mode.

Attached are 4 png images of the results.  Not on the graph are the
automatic RF gains (psa).

f9t-generic-l5.png   u-blox generic L1 only antenna
    L1 psa 45 dB
    L5 psa 39 dB

    The generic only needed 3 dB more gain, and had a nice flat pass
    band.

f9t-mb-l5.png        u-blox MB-00-00 L1/l2 antenna
    L1 psa 42 dB
    L5 psa 54 dB

    The MB needed a lot (18 dB) more gain, but otherwise the L5
    pass-band looked OK.

f9t-mb1-l5.png       u-blox MB1-00-00 L1/L5 antenna
    L1 psa 42 dB
    L5 psa 36 dB

    The MB1 has slightly funcky L1 and L5 pass-bands.  Similar to the
    MB2.

f9t-mb2-l5.png       u-blox MB2-00-00 L1/L2/L5/ antenna
    L1 psa 42 dB
    L5 psa 36 dB

    The MB2 has roughest L1 and L5 pass-bands.

I'm not sure what it all means for final accuracy, but it
does point to some observations.

1. Don't use an L1/L2 antenna if you need L1/L6.

2. Sometimes a generic L1 antenna looks almost as good as and L1/L5
antenna.  In this case flatter pass-bands but slightly less gain.

More details on doing your own antenna testing here:

https://gpsd.io/ubxtool-examples.html#_antenna_testing


RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
        [email protected]  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

            Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin

Attachment: pgpUCSOkWKwFv.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to