Am 29.01.2010 15:01, schrieb ext Marty Connor: > > On 1/29/10 8:39 AM, Marty Connor wrote: > > On 1/22/10 10:25 AM, Bernhard Kohl wrote: > >> By the way, I saw that my patch was already applied on the master > >> branch. There is some disordering of the comment lines. The line /* > Find > >> the significant bits */ must go 2 lines lower. > >> Thank You > >> Bernhard > > > > Hi Bernhard, > > > > I rewrote the pci_bar_size function for clarity and to make clear that > > we (gPXE developers) are not convinced that the saving of the > > PCI_COMMAND word is needed. > > > > Our larger concern is that we are masking a KVM PCI bug here, and we > > would prefer not to add this work-around to our code if we can avoid > it. > > As far as I can tell, the saving and restoring of that word is a NOOP. > > > > Please test the attached patch and let us know if it works. > > > > Thanks for your help with this, > > > > / Marty / > > I messed up the first patch. Please try the attached one instead. > > Thanks, > > / Marty / > > Hi Marty,
your rewritten patch works well for me. I'll try to do the additional tests as requested by Stefan during the next days. And congratulations for the gPXE-1.0.0 release! Bernhard _______________________________________________ gPXE-devel mailing list [email protected] http://etherboot.org/mailman/listinfo/gpxe-devel
