Marty Connor <[email protected]> writes: > Eric W. Biederman wrote on 7/13/10 1:37 PM: >> Marty Connor<[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>> I was wondering if you got my email recently about acking the information >>> change >>> request for the Etherboot Project Enterprise ID? >> >> Why do you care? Etherboot's successors implements neither snmp nor dhcpv6. >> >> Eric > > I care because we happen to use enterprise ID for a field in our iSCSI SAN > booting login request, and also because we have plans to implement IPv6 > booting > support in gPXE. > > Right now we are using an enterprise ID that we do not control, and would much > rather have control of the one that was registered to our project. > > Did you receive the ack request to change contact information for our > Enterprise > ID? If so, would you ack it so we can use the one that was assigned to us? > > If there's a reason why you prefer not to do this please tell me what it is. > I'd really like to get this done soon so we can update our code.
I prefer not to. Marty you and Michael Brown have not successfully figured out how to work with each other, and neither of you alone appears to me to be a proper successor of the etherboot project. When I registered this number I figured I was the contact person holding this number in trust for the etherboot project, and I figure I still am. The open source successors of etherboot are free to use that Enterprise id as they see fit. However if it comes to a disagreement that can not be resolved in a peaceable manner and some one has to make an arbitrary decision I volunteer to be the outside arbiter that makes that decision. Eric _______________________________________________ gPXE-devel mailing list [email protected] http://etherboot.org/mailman/listinfo/gpxe-devel
