On 9/2/06, Edgar Poce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's only one drawback that comes to my mind: since the content will be touched from many places all the constraints and security policies should be handled at the repository level in order to guarantee data integrity. That would probably lead to extend the repository constraint functionality through decoration or whatever strategy. WDYT? has it any sense?.
of course Anyway, I'm working on the wysiwyg jcr
portlet to show how a porlet "content" mode would look, I'll share it asap.
ok
----------------------- gft modules ----------------------- gft services -------------- ----------------------- jcr portlets gft persistence service ---------------------------------------- webdav |-> jcr | rdbms | fs | webdav cifs | nfs | ldap | etc.
What is jcr portlets, I think it is JCR service or something like that no ? eg. portlet JCR admin browser -> jcr service -> One of the referenced JCR server.