Question #170794 on Graphite changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/graphite/+question/170794
Status: Open => Answered chrismd proposed the following answer: The problem definitely appears to be related to the high I/O utilization as there is no CPU bottleneck, the incoming metrics vastly exceeds the datapoints getting written to disk, and the cache is completely full (hence all the gaps in the graphs). What does your I/O utilization look like with no carbon daemons running? (hopefully around 0% when measured over a 60-second interval). If you set MAX_UPDATES_PER_SECOND to 50 then carbon should be doing very little I/O work, so maybe some other process on the machine is generating this I/O load? Also how much ram do you have? A huge piece of the performance puzzle for graphite is having enough ram for the kernel to buffer writes. If you have too little ram or other processes on the machine eating it up that could cause problems like this. It may be beneficial to run an I/O benchmark like bonnie to make sure the system is setup for optimal performance. -- You received this question notification because you are a member of graphite-dev, which is an answer contact for Graphite. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~graphite-dev Post to : graphite-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~graphite-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp