Brad Douglas wrote: > > [Well, personally I would just remove r.terraflow, having been written > > without any consideration for GRASS' build system or coding > > conventions, or portability in general. But that's just me.] > > I agree with the sentiment, but I don't know how practical that is at > the moment.
That comment was more just general complaining than actual advocacy of such a step. The one factor in r.terraflow's favour is that the problems with r.terraflow only affect r.terraflow itself. If they affected anything else, it would be gone by now ;) -- Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
