Markus Neteler wrote: > Yes: these files you have to obtain from the OpenDesign Alliance. > AFAIK we could distribute binaries of v.in.dwg if there were dynamic > DWGDirect libraries available, but they aren't (at least not some months > ago). Since they only provide static libraries (.a instead of .so), they get > compiled into GRASS and hence fall under the "no distribution" restriction.
It doesn't make any difference whether the libraries are static or dynamic. Unless you can supply the OpenDWG/DWGDirect source code under a GPL-compatible licence, you cannot distribute a binary which is linked (statically or dynamically) against both the GRASS libraries and the DWG libraries. -- Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
