Dylan Beaudette-2 wrote: > > Hi, > > I have posted some minor cosmetic / printing patches in the past to the > Gforge > site, however it looks like they were either overlooked- or not deemed > worth > implementing. >
To me it seems to be overlooked in GForge. I like the "trac" approach where milestones are assigned. This leads to a roadmap which is transparent to developers and users. See GDAL for example: http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/roadmap Markus PS: I see no reason to reject your patch. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Minor-patchesL-v.transform-tf4483080.html#a12786583 Sent from the Grass - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
