On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 10:09:33PM +0200, Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote: > On Saturday 29 September 2007 09:58, Markus Neteler wrote: > > Jan-Oliver Wagner-2 wrote: > > > On Friday 28 September 2007 14:06, Markus Neteler wrote: > > >> Jan-Oliver Wagner wrote on 09/27/2007 08:37 PM: > > >> > one of the Admins of the GForge grass project can switch on other > > >> > modules, among them SCM (Source Code Management, == SVN), a wiki (I > > >> > don't like this implementation) and other stuff.
Don't you like the GForge Wiki or Wiki in general? > > >> Currently I don't know who is admin (AFAIK Maciej, anyone else?). > > >> I have no list of available modules (this is what I am asking for...). > > > > > > see top right box of http://wald.intevation.org/projects/grass > > > > Not sure what to see there... > > the names of the project admins and developers. > The project admins is what you were looking for. Yes, right: Bernhard Reiter Maciej Sieczka > > Jan-Oliver Wagner-2 wrote: > > >> Ah, this means that there is a link between SVN and GForge? To visualize > > >> patches and such? I am honestly asking since I don't know (and cannot > > >> spend more time on searching around). > > > > > > E.g. look at http://wald.intevation.org/scm/?group_id=27 > > > which is the SVN for deegree project. > > > Click on browse and you enter viewcvs 1.0. Welcome home ;-) > > > > OK, fine (not enabled for GRASS apparently). > > up to project admins to do so. OK - I am none, so I cannot do anything. > > Jan-Oliver Wagner-2 wrote: > > > Markus Neteler wrote: > > > > Jan, for several *months* we try to complete the list to make a > > > > *reasonable* comparison. Again: concrete input is welcome. You as GForge > > > > developer will know much more; we (a set of GRASS developers) are > > > > lacking this knowledge. > > > > > > I am not a GForge developer. I am a GForge *user*. And a Sourceforge > > > user. And a user of Savannah and of trac. ;-) > > > BTW, GForge is a Sourceforge fork. > > > > > > Doing a comparison of such platforms is far beyond scope I guess. > > > Perhaps it is better to collect some needs of the developers and > > > simply select a platform that suits them? I guess that at the end of the > > > day > > > any platform will do the job good enough of managing SVN. > > > > Not entirely sure if any platform will do the job good enough. We clearly > > see that GForge for GRASS is way under-used. > > I guess you mean the bug tracker is underused? Yes. Numerous active developers are not even registered there (see 'Developers:' on the page mentioned above). Additionally, there are several useful features either missing in GForge or not activated (I cannot judge that since still I don't know what's available and possible). But I feel that we start to go in circles. Markus > -- > Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner Intevation GmbH > Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HR B 18998 http://www.intevation.de/ > Geschäftsführer: Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner ------------------ ITC -> dall'1 marzo 2007 Fondazione Bruno Kessler ITC -> since 1 March 2007 Fondazione Bruno Kessler ------------------ _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
