It's completely flat. I just did another test. If I use a vector attribute column in layer 1, the entire interpolated map has a value of 0 for all cells. If I create a 3D vector with the same data and set layer=0 so that it uses z values, it works fine.
So I guess it sounds like a bug. Michael On 10/11/07 1:56 AM, "Roberto Antolin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Michael and all, > > Michael Barton escribió: >> However, if I try to specify a vector column as the basis for interpolation, >> it will go through fine, but the result is a flat map. That is, it seems not >> to correctly recognize a column specified for interpolation. I set layer=1, >> but don't see what else I should do. Any suggestions? > > Is it completely flat? I mean, did you try to take a look to the raster > values? Time ago, border errors (due to the interpolation) made > visualization a bit odd because, in borders, v.surf.bspline try to > interpolate to zero. So depending on the values you want to interpolate > it will seem that the whole raster has the same value but really it > hasn't. I thought this error was fixed already, though. Which version > are you using? > > I don't know whether is this or not, so let me know and I'll proceed > with the bugfixing -in case there exits any bug ;)-. In the meanwhile > I'll try to find the dataset I used in my tests and I'll check too. > > Regards, > Roberto. __________________________________________ Michael Barton, Professor of Anthropology Director of Graduate Studies School of Human Evolution & Social Change Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity Arizona State University phone: 480-965-6213 fax: 480-965-7671 www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
