Like Michael, +1 from me. Markus
Michael Barton wrote on 10/16/2007 02:26 AM: > While I'm not unhappy with the current setup, moving to OSGeo seems like a > good idea for both technical and organizational reasons. > > 1+ > > Michael > > > On 10/15/07 12:40 PM, "Markus Neteler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Fellow PSC members, >> >> after long discussions, according to our (yet proposed) rules >> of voting [1], I motion that the GRASS CVS server be migrated >> into SVN server on OSGeo infrastructure as well as the bug tracker >> be migrated to Trac on OSGeo infrastructure. >> >> Rationale and background information to compare the current >> solution to the proposed solution: >> http://grass.gdf-hannover.de/wiki/SVN_hosting >> >> Vote closure: >> Sunday, 21 October 2007, 23:59 UTC. >> >> I'll collate votes and present the result to the PSC (with cc to the >> grass-dev list) on Monday, Oct. 22th 2007. >> >> Best regards, >> Markus >> >> [1] http://mpa.itc.it/markus/grass63progman/rfc/rfc3_psc.html >> >> _______________________________________________ >> grass-psc mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc >> ------------------ ITC -> dall'1 marzo 2007 Fondazione Bruno Kessler ITC -> since 1 March 2007 Fondazione Bruno Kessler ------------------ _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
