Michael Barton ha scritto: > I couldn't agree more about the importance of a GUI to a large and growing > number of GRASS users. I can't help but point out that GRASS also has its > own GUI-integrated approach, that includes all available modules and is > actively under development (mature, stable TclTk and development wxPython). > Because it follows a different philosophy of integrating high-level GRASS > module commands rather than the lower-level GRASS libraries, we don't run > into this kind of problem as much.
On the other side, we must admit for the average GIS user the native GRASS GUIs are less smooth to use, and more surprising, when compared to QGIS. All the best. pc -- Paolo Cavallini, see: http://www.faunalia.it/pc
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list [email protected] http://grass.itc.it/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
