Recently at work we also switched to cmake from autotools, and life is
much simpler now. I would gladly help if we do decide to switch.
A few benefits of cmake include generating native visual studio project
and build files. Trivial way of generating dll libraries and linking in
general. The same configuration files work on all platforms.
--Wolf
On 31.01.2008 15:57, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Ivan Shmakov ha scritto:
Sorry for raising this issue once again, but are there any plans
to switch to more recent versions of Autoconf?
BTW: I followed the switch of qgis, from automake to cmake, and I think
it was a good success (*much* less bloody than I expected). Now
compilation is way smoother and faster.
Would it be reasonable to do the same for GRASS?
All the best.
pc
--
<:3 )---- Wolf Bergenheim ----( 8:>
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
