> Eric: > > Is there any preferred way for using html markup for tagging module > names, parameter names, and flags in the document html pages?
Martin Landa wrote: > AFAIK not really. I think you will find that they are in fact quite consistent already. (with lots of exceptions) > * <h2>See also</h2> > <em> > <a href="module1.html">module1</a>, > <a href="module2.html">module2</a> > <em> > > instead of > > <em> > <a href="module1.html">module1</a>,<br> > <a href="module2.html">module2</a> > <em> I have never really had a good answer for that: for a few entries all on one line looks ok, for many entries it is much easier to scan down a one module per line. In general Markus has put them across, I have put them one per line. shrug, just a matter of preference I guess. In general SEE ALSO modules are listed in alphabetical order, but sometimes important ones have been put first. shrug. If referencing external software or PDF/PostScript guides linked from the website put a paragraph break between them and the modules (modules come first). I expect there are many dead links to non-ported GRASS 5 modules and many help pages may talk of obsolete interactive mode. Hamish ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev