On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 1:04 AM, Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Markus Neteler wrote: > > > >> Can we trap this? Otherwise we can run it locally and fix all warnings > > >> manually in SVN before running the global automated indenting. > > > > > > You can verify that the indentation isn't changing the semantics of > > > the code by compiling everything[1] without -g and with -DNDEBUG, > > > before and after indenting, and comparing the .o files. > > > > Mhh, sounds like quite some work. > > Not really:
So, to summarize: the indentation is safe, when - applying indent to all .c and .h but reverting - imagery/i.atcorr/*.h - gui/wxpython/nviz/*.h - gui/wxpython/vdigit/*.h - raster/r.terraflow/*.h - raster/r.terraflow/IOStream/include/*.h Right? Technical question: I feel several developers here yet ignore this heavy impact change. Should I post a diff first? Or announce a date (which?) and submit then? Both 6.4.svn and 7.svn are affected to be able to backport also in future. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev