Doug: > Your patch did the trick. Reports 2,423,793,110 points processed.
great. > That is less than reported by wc -l , but I had some upper and lower > limts to exclude outliers, which may account for the difference. you can look at debug messages for a little more info, rerun with scan z-bounds inverted, and check r.univar's SUM for a "method=n" map. g.gisenv set="DEBUG=1" you'll get more info with level 2, back to none with 0. The max is 5 but r.in.xyz doesn't use that. > Did you want a run without limits to see if the numbers exactly match? It's up to you. see also http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/123 points exactly matching the southern boundary are ignored. and the BUGS section at end of the help page. It would be comforting to have the books exactly balance. Hamish _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
