Huidae Cho wrote:
> its current name g."m"list (modified g.list) is somewhat awkward compared
> to g."x"list (extended g.list).
I had always though that it stood for many-list. And in that light it works
and no need to change it- unless you want a way to make it obvious that
compatibility is broken and scripts using it may silently fail or
unexpectedly give a different result.
But I'll respect and take your word as for the author's original intentions.
;)
Hamish
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
