On Oct 6, 2008, at 9:00 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:19:38 +0200
From: Moritz Lennert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [GRASS-dev] porting r.in.wms to python
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Glynn Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, grass-dev
<grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 06/10/08 04:16, Hamish wrote:
Glynn wrote:
d.vect.thematic (d.mon)
(somewhat replaced d.thematic.area,v.class? any thoughts Moritz/
Michael?)
d.thematic.area works for me, but I have not had any testing feedback
from anyone else.
I still need to finish "d.thematic.points_and_lines" (still need to
find
a good name for it, or split it into two d.thematic.points and
d.thematic.lines). Probably "just" a 1-2 days job for me (1-2 hours
for
others ;-) ), but I need a full stretch of time to be able to
concentrate on it, and this is a very rare commodity in my life at
this
time (and has been for a while).
I've tried working with the thematic area C-module. I think the last
time I tried it, I hit a bug, Moritz fixed it, and I haven't had a
chance to try it again. This is much preferable over the very complex
bash script I wrote and others have enhanced. As Moritz says, it needs
testing and the points/lines version needs to be finished. Porting the
existing script is not terribly hard (though it would be time
consuming) and the display section needs rewriting to deal with the
demise of d.mon.
However, the C-modules are better and should replace the script.
Michael
Moritz
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
