Below is a recent exchange between Markus (Neteler) and me about the
new r.watershed.fast.
The gist is the question: is it ready to go into the develbranch_6 and
trunk (7) svn or does it need more testing. I thought it was already
in the main svn, but Markus pointed out that it is still in Addons.
Michael
Begin forwarded message:
From: Markus Neteler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: October 9, 2008 1:38:37 PM GMT-07:00
To: "Michael Barton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [GRASS-user] Re: grass-user Digest, Vol 30, Issue 22
Please post it to the list, too. :)
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Michael Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
We're almost at a point of recompiling GRASS on our main modeling
box. When
we do that, we will certainly test the new r.watershed.fast.
However, if
others test and want to include this in the svn, it's fine by me to
go ahead
and replace the old module.
Michael
______________________________
C. Michael Barton, Professor of Anthropology
Director of Graduate Studies
School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ 85287-2402
USA
voice: 480-965-6262; fax: 480-965-7671
www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton
On Oct 9, 2008, at 1:04 PM, Markus Neteler wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Michael Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
Ah.
But I did think that it was tested last summer, that it worked
well, and
the
commentators on the list thought that it should be moved into the
main
svn.
Do you think we need more testing? If so, I'll try to have some
done
here.
I am fine with all - if results are identical to old r.watershed and
the paramters/flags
are compliant, we can replace it even in 6.4. If not, put into 7.
I am out of time to do tests unfortunately.
Markus
--
Open Source Geospatial Foundation
http://www.osgeo.org/
http://www.grassbook.org/
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
