On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:00 AM, Markus Neteler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Markus Neteler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Roger Bivand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Dylan Beaudette wrote: >>>> Have the changes in the rgdal package made it into the mainstream code? I >>>> have submitted tickets to the GRASS trac site for the v.out.ogr patch. The >>>> changes you suggested appear to work well. >>> >>> No sign of any change in the 6.3 or 6.4 trunks, unfortunately. 7.0 has the >>> same bug. No response to the posting or your tickets. The only relevant >>> thread was Markus' suggesting a name change in 7.0. Hamish: could you please >>> prod the person(s) needed to move on ticket 333, and get them to do the same >>> on 6.4 and 7.0 (the patch is for 6.3)? >> >> I have fixed trax #333 now with minor modification (C++ style comments >> are no good). >> Applied to 6.3.svn, 6.4.svn, 7.svn. > > Sorry, discovered only now that the 6.4.svn fix was uncommitted on my > laptop. Submitted as revision 34049, unfortunately with wrong ticket > reference. > > So, now this issue should be really solved. > > Markus >
Thanks Markus. I'll update my local copy and give it a try. This should fix several long-standing issues with moving data from GRASS->R. Cheers, Dylan _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
