Michael wrote:
> If this tests OK, it would be good to get it backported into 6.4 too.
at some point we have to stop allowing experimental code into devbr6...
I'd rather we kept the r.watershed that was there now (faster but importantly
identical output), and leave the ongoing development of the MDF version* in
trunk.
[*] and anything else which isn't a bug fix or fills a large usability hole
2c,
Hamish
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
