On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Martin Landa wrote:
Hi,
2008/12/1 Martin Landa <landa.mar...@gmail.com>:
2008/12/1 Hamish <hamis...@yahoo.com>:
so what remains todo befor 6.4rc1? IMO lib API and module list should be
frozen at that point, which means creating releasebranch_6_4. No need to
I also added to the list nviz_cmd module. I am not sure about its
name. Any ideas?
nviz.cmd
I remember votes for d.3d and votes again this proposal. Any consensus
before rc1? Personally I have nothing against d.3d. One of the options
would to rename d.nviz to something else, e.g. d.nviz.fly and d.nviz
use for nviz_cmd(?)
Glynn was against d.3d because he said he felt all d.* modules should be
related to using the Raster library for 2-D drawing. He definitely has a
point but d.nviz at least has already broken that convention - there
*might* be others in the past but I'm not sure. Personally I tend to think
it isn't such a big deal, especially as the "3d" in the name clearly
suggests it's different anyway.
d.nviz will wait for 7.0 - is that correct? So we can put off a decision
on its name. d.3d.fly, d.3d.flythrough or d.3d.flythru might all be good
names.
Paul
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
