Hi, I wonder if we should use bzip2 instead of gzip for the tarballs.
Simple test with 6.4.0rc2: gzip: 19722441 bytes (orig; tar czf) bzip2: 15997928 bytes (tar cjf) uncmp: 83MB (du -sh) the cost is longer encoding times (but not so bad), the benefit is reduced bandwidth. comments? Hamish _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
