#430: i.pca's output and history logged "Comments" disagree
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  nikos        |       Owner:  grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org      
      Type:  defect       |      Status:  new                            
  Priority:  major        |   Milestone:  6.4.0                          
 Component:  Raster       |     Version:  unspecified                    
Resolution:               |    Keywords:  i.pca, output messages, history
  Platform:  Unspecified  |         Cpu:  Unspecified                    
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by nikos):

 Replying to [comment:2 hamish]:
 > awaiting comments

 Now that I look again at the results (meaning the tests I have sent in the
 ML and in the wiki as well [1]) I think that your thought about increasing
 the decimals printed in i.pca's output is not a bad idea.

 Perhaps adding one more digit to make it look like (arbitrary numbers
 here):

 Eigen values, (vectors), and [percent importance]:[[BR]]
 PC1 6307563.04 ( -0.643 -0.653 -0.423 ) [ 98.71% ][[BR]]
 PC2 78023.63 ( -0.713 0.283 0.643 ) [ 1.22% ][[BR]]
 PC3 4504.60 ( -0.303 0.713 -0.643 ) [ 0.07% ]

 Kind regards, Nikos

 [1] http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/Principal_Component_Analysis

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/ticket/430#comment:3>
GRASS GIS <http://grass.osgeo.org>
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev

Reply via email to