That would be excellent.
With some interface tweaking, I have nothing inherently against the
osgeo4w installer, but a stand alone along the lines of what you are
preparing will be a big help in a number of cases, especially in
universities and other large institutions where we are trying to get
people to consider open source.
It may even get people to try the osgeo4w installer for the other apps
if it is successful.
Michael
______________________________
C. Michael Barton, Professor of Anthropology
Director of Graduate Studies
School of Human Evolution & Social Change
Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ 85287-2402
USA
voice: 480-965-6262; fax: 480-965-7671
www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton
On Mar 31, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Colin Nielsen wrote:
I'm working on the installer, I think I've almost got it. I'll post an
update in the next couple of days. I'm working on Vista, so that's
what I'll be packaging, but as long as the vista version doesn't cause
problems in xp (and as far as i know it doesn't) we shouldn't need two
windows packages.
-Colin
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Martin Landa
<landa.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
2009/3/31 Michael Barton <michael.bar...@asu.edu>:
Native, stand alone installer for GRASS should be a high priority.
I guess
we need both an XP and Vista version.
personally I have no problem with osgeo4w installer. Ideally should
be
mentained both - standalone and osgeo4w - if we have enough manpower.
If no, I would incline to osgeo4w.
1CZK
M.
--
Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/
~landa
_______________________________________________
grass-dev mailing list
grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
