Paul wrote: > Probably we should update datumtransform.table with the > correct Belgium 72 parameters. But it would be reassuring to > find out where the wrong ones have come from first...
.... and which ones are in fact "wrong" ... I'm a bit surprised that Belgium is big enough to have two regional sets with significant differences. How far appart are points transformed using the two 7-term paramerts? 10s of meters? just a few cm? Hamish _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev