Hi, 2010/5/26 Glynn Clements <gl...@gclements.plus.com>:
[...] > Is there a reason not to add the ctypes stuff to 6.4.0? Even if there > are problems with it, they shouldn't interfere with the other Python > code (i.e. grass.script). not really. +1 for backporting ctypes to all active branches. Martin -- Martin Landa <landa.martin gmail.com> * http://gama.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev
